In the context of the climate and resource crisis, and given the ambition of the EU, a broad platform of almost fifty organizations from 13 European countries wants to remind the Council representatives that there is still time to raise the ambition of the final PPWR wording. This can be done, among others, by assuring the key role of a solid Deposit Return System (DRS), a necessary tool to ensure true circularity for single-use beverage containers.
It is worth noting that in the Plenary, all amendments aimed at making DRS voluntary for Members States were rejected by the European Parliament (EP), showing a firm position of the EP, in line with the original proposal by the European Commission, to have DRS become the norm in Europe. However, the wording of article 44 on DRS, as a result of the EP’s vote, lacks the ambition and the strength of the initial wording of the Commission and could open the door to critical shortcuts and loopholes that could delay the implementation of DRS all over Europe.
This group of organizations, that already presented a joint position paper previous to the vote on the Plenary, asks for a final version of the PPWR that protects a proven-to-be-effective DRS by:
Why do we need a solid and effective DRS?
Alexis Eisenberg, Director France and Francophonie, Reloop Platform (France): “The European Commission and Parliament endorse mandatory DRS in the PPWR, a pivotal text shaping the next decade of Europe’s packaging sector. DRS, a potent EPR tool, achieves high collection rates, closed-loop recycling, and reuse. The Council must now strengthen this support, with a crucial call from France to join the cause. Despite having DRS provisions in its anti-waste law (AGEC, 2020), France has struggled to break the status quo, leading to 8 billion plastic bottles and cans wasted per year. It’s time to propel mandatory DRS for a more circular Europe”
Chloé Schwizgebel, project coordinator at Recycling Netwerk Benelux (Belgium): “A strong DRS legislation in the PPWR is fully aligned with the large ambitions of Belgium in terms of recycling, prevention, reuse as well as litter reduction. The Belgian governments are themselves preparing for the introduction of a DRS in 2025. Going for anything else than a mandatory DRS would not make sense from the Belgian presidency perspective.”
Miquel Roset, director of Retorna (Spain): “The Spanish presidency and the permanent representatives from Spain need to keep fighting for the best possible outcome for the PPWR, as the Presidency has shown to aim for so far with a mandatory Deposit Return System. Without a DRS, every day in Spain, 35 million beverage containers are either landfilled, incinerated or littered. We support any effort by Spain to stick to such commitment and dismiss proposals to water ambition down. We need a DRS so we can reuse or recycle into new containers these containers”.
Next steps
Last 22nd of November, the European Parliament voted in their Plenary session an amended version of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), which will be the basis for the negotiatory position of the EP; concurrently, the Council is preparing its own position, which is due to be defined next few weeks. The Trilogue negotiations, expected to start in December, will be the last stop for this legislation.
Location: Incubadora de Empresas da Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Pavilhão B1, 8005-226 Faro
Phone: +351 936 257 281
Email: sciaena@sciaena.org